SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L
SSXF.L (iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SSXF.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist), while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSXF.L returned 0.32%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSXF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSXF.L is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXF.L achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SSXF.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 0.32%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.
SSXF.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- -2.17%
- 10Y*
- 0.32%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- 6M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | -0.15% | 1.57% | 4.52% | 10.82% | -24.14% | 2.57% | 2.91% | 17.08% | -2.97% | -0.09% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -3.60% | 45.64% | 34.39% | 9.51% | 6.07% | 3.50% | 13.41% | 21.93% | 3.07% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXF.L and SGLN.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSXF.L
SGLN.L
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXF.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.07 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 2.55 | -1.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -47.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXF.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXF.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -47.83% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.58% | -22.56% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.00% | -22.56% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.80% | -22.56% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -22.56% | -11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -21.52% | +9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -22.38% | +14.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 9.51% | -6.57% |
Volatility
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) is 1.90%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that SSXF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXF.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 6.72% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.48% | 21.21% | -14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.58% | 24.52% | -16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 22.10% | -12.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 18.02% | -8.19% |
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSXF.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
SSXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 4.53% | 4.34% | 3.88% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 2.55% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.78% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXF.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSXF.L.
SSXF.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. SSXF.L tracks iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist), while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSXF.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for SSXF.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer