SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L
SSXF.L (iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and FLOS.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SSXF.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx Sterling Corporate Bond ex Financials Index, while FLOS.L is a Ultra Short-Term Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note <5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSXF.L returned -2.18%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for FLOS.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSXF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FLOS.L.
Performance
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSXF.L is traded in EUR, while FLOS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLOS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXF.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLOS.L's 5.04% return.
SSXF.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- 0.31%
FLOS.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | -0.24% | 1.57% | 4.52% | 10.82% | -24.14% | 2.57% | 2.91% | 17.08% | -2.97% | 3.76% |
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 5.04% | -0.68% | 11.37% | 8.25% | -4.37% | 6.62% | -5.26% | 8.94% | -1.68% | 4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXF.L and FLOS.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SSXF.L and FLOS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSXF.L
FLOS.L
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXF.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 4.07 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 11.10 | -9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than FLOS.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXF.L and FLOS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXF.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -23.79% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.58% | -1.52% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.00% | -5.94% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.80% | -7.53% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -0.45% | -12.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -2.68% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 0.56% | +2.38% |
Volatility
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) at 1.01%. This indicates that SSXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXF.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 1.01% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | 2.73% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 4.03% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 5.64% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 7.29% | +2.54% |
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSXF.L vs. FLOS.L - Dividend Comparison
SSXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FLOS.L's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 5.93% | 5.46% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.62% | 2.95% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 2.33% | 4.34% | 3.88% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 2.55% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.78% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXF.L and FLOS.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSXF.L.
SSXF.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOS.L is Ultra Short-Term Bonds. SSXF.L tracks iBoxx Sterling Corporate Bond ex Financials Index, while FLOS.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note <5 Years Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSXF.L and 0.12% for FLOS.L.
Find the right allocation for SSXF.L and FLOS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer