PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSTHX vs. FAHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSTHX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than FAHCX's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SSTHX has underperformed FAHCX with an annualized return of 3.85%, while FAHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.82% annualized return.


SSTHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.51%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
3.85%

FAHCX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.66%
YTD
7.16%
6M
8.28%
1Y
17.33%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSTHX
Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund
1.51%6.48%6.28%6.86%-2.32%3.16%5.44%6.64%0.59%2.21%
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
7.16%12.06%9.50%12.15%-11.15%10.96%8.94%17.81%-5.25%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SSTHX and FAHCX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.57

The correlation between SSTHX and FAHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSTHX vs. FAHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSTHX
SSTHX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SSTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SSTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FAHCX
FAHCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FAHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSTHXFAHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

3.14

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.10

4.62

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.63

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

5.65

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.15

23.75

+0.39

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FAHCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSTHX and FAHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSTHXFAHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

3.14

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.30

1.02

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

1.03

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.98

+0.28

Drawdowns

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSTHX drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum FAHCX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSTHX and FAHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSTHXFAHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-48.10%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.39%

-3.13%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.05%

-6.98%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.05%

-15.16%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

-28.49%

+14.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-4.62%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

0.74%

-0.48%

Volatility

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund (SSTHX) is 0.72%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that SSTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSTHXFAHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

1.67%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

4.37%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

5.58%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.11%

6.38%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

7.63%

-4.09%

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSTHX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FAHCX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSTHX vs. FAHCX - Dividend Comparison

SSTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than FAHCX's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
4.40%4.73%4.18%4.70%7.35%4.94%3.70%4.51%6.09%4.95%5.53%4.42%
SSTHX
Allspring Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund
5.52%5.61%5.81%5.04%3.85%3.35%3.34%3.27%3.16%2.81%2.93%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSTHX and FAHCX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAHCX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to SSTHX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSTHX dropped -14.24% vs FAHCX's -48.10%.

FAHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSTHX and FAHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer