SSO vs. CRMU
SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SSO tracks the S&P 500 while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
SSO vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSO
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 24.26%
CRMU
- 1D
- -13.83%
- 1M
- -28.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 9.90% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -64.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSO and CRMU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSO vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank
SSO
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SSO vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSO | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSO vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSO drawdown since its inception was -84.67%, which is greater than CRMU's maximum drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSO and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSO | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.67% | -73.81% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -64.46% | +57.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.53% | -46.63% | +27.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | — | — |
Volatility
SSO vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSO | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 246.03% | -221.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.85% | 246.03% | -212.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 246.03% | -210.10% |
SSO vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSO vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSO and CRMU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
SSO tracks S&P 500, while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SSO and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for SSO and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer