PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSMKX vs. SSHQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund (SSMKX) and State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSMKX achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than SSHQX's 14.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSMKX having a 12.03% annualized return and SSHQX not far ahead at 12.44%.


SSMKX

1D
1.80%
1M
-1.14%
6M
12.05%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
12.03%
ALL TIME*
12.41%

SSHQX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.69%
6M
9.61%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSMKX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund
15.37%12.77%17.20%25.20%-25.49%12.38%32.41%27.82%-9.02%18.16%
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
14.27%23.42%13.71%19.74%-4.73%19.32%2.47%24.83%-9.27%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMKX and SSHQX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.67

The correlation between SSMKX and SSHQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSMKX vs. SSHQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSMKX
SSMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SSMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHQX
SSHQX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund (SSMKX) and State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSMKXSSHQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.06

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

12.73

-3.64

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the SSHQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSMKX and SSHQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMKX drawdown since its inception was -41.65%, which is greater than SSHQX's maximum drawdown of -31.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMKX and SSHQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSMKXSSHQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.65%

-31.84%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-9.69%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.31%

-13.99%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.19%

-14.79%

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.65%

-31.84%

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-0.38%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-3.32%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.32%

+0.56%

Volatility

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund (SSMKX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund (SSHQX) at 3.28%. This indicates that SSMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSMKXSSHQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.28%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

10.34%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

12.49%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

13.48%

+8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

14.95%

+7.31%

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHQX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSMKX vs. SSHQX - Dividend Comparison

SSMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than SSHQX's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SSHQX
State Street Hedged International Developed Equity Index Fund
3.15%3.60%3.11%3.77%22.27%2.93%2.03%5.14%7.33%3.12%4.30%
SSMKX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund
4.42%5.10%2.12%2.56%17.09%9.69%1.47%5.75%3.68%5.52%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSMKX and SSHQX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSMKX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SSHQX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMKX dropped -41.65% vs SSHQX's -31.84%.

SSHQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSMKX and SSHQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer