SSMHX vs. IBGIX
SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) and IBGIX (VY Baron Growth Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSMHX returned 11.70%/yr vs 14.64%/yr for IBGIX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSMHX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IBGIX.
Performance
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSMHX achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than IBGIX's -11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SSMHX has underperformed IBGIX with an annualized return of 11.70%, while IBGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.64% annualized return.
SSMHX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
IBGIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -13.23%
- YTD
- -11.85%
- 1Y
- -17.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.64%
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 15.27% | 12.90% | 10.73% | 25.21% | -25.43% | 13.08% | 32.46% | 28.00% | -9.21% | 18.26% |
IBGIX VY Baron Growth Portfolio | -11.85% | -10.40% | 4.84% | 15.02% | -23.40% | 20.76% | 33.55% | 166.57% | -1.63% | 28.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSMHX and IBGIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SSMHX and IBGIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSMHX vs. IBGIX — Risk / Return Rank
SSMHX
IBGIX
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) and VY Baron Growth Portfolio (IBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSMHX | IBGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.85 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.79 | +3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | -1.35 | +10.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSMHX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, smaller than the maximum IBGIX drawdown of -57.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMHX and IBGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSMHX | IBGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.61% | -57.44% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | -23.26% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.38% | -30.02% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -34.38% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | -40.82% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -28.04% | +25.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -14.21% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 14.24% | -11.44% |
Volatility
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) is 3.94%, while VY Baron Growth Portfolio (IBGIX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that SSMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSMHX | IBGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 6.11% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 14.54% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 19.15% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 20.92% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 35.99% | -13.63% |
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSMHX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IBGIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSMHX vs. IBGIX - Dividend Comparison
SSMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than IBGIX's 77.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGIX VY Baron Growth Portfolio | 77.33% | 24.66% | 4.13% | 5.23% | 11.56% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 107.13% | 11.51% | 12.13% | 11.71% | 8.93% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 6.18% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 2.31% | 16.30% | 2.91% | 3.65% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 1.71% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSMHX and IBGIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBGIX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to SSMHX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSMHX dropped -41.61% vs IBGIX's -57.44%.
SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSMHX and IBGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer