SSLCX vs. TSCSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX).
SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000. TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996.
Performance
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLCX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than TSCSX's -3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLCX has underperformed TSCSX with an annualized return of 9.91%, while TSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCSX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSLCX vs. TSCSX — Risk / Return Rank
SSLCX
TSCSX
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLCX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.56 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 2.01 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLCX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.19 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLCX and TSCSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Dividend Comparison
SSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than TSCSX's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
Drawdowns
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than TSCSX's maximum drawdown of -56.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLCX and TSCSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLCX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -56.66% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -14.31% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.57% | -27.04% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.07% | -41.63% | -6.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -11.36% | +5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -10.29% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.96% | -0.87% |
Volatility
SSLCX vs. TSCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) is 4.67%, while Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that SSLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLCX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 6.31% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.48% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 22.16% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 21.65% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 22.08% | -1.02% |