SSLCX vs. QISCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) and QISCX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSLCX returned 10.93%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for QISCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSLCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QISCX.

Performance

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLCX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than QISCX's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLCX has underperformed QISCX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while QISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.

SSLCX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

QISCX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 41.00%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 12.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	12.74%	4.99%	9.85%	13.09%	-13.53%	41.16%	14.65%	21.72%	-14.28%	11.63%
QISCX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund	15.16%	14.95%	14.82%	20.58%	-23.14%	30.60%	17.00%	18.06%	-11.63%	15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLCX and QISCX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between SSLCX and QISCX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SSLCX vs. QISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLCX

SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 24
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QISCX

QISCX Risk / Return Rank: 51
QISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSLCX	QISCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.96	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.87	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.42	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.06	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.69	9.47	-2.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the QISCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLCX and QISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSLCX	QISCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.96	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.40	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.51	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.34	+0.05

Drawdowns

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, smaller than the maximum QISCX drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLCX and QISCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSLCX	QISCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.14%	-68.05%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-13.48%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.34%	-26.51%	+9.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.57%	-32.89%	+10.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.07%	-49.02%	+0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-15.67%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	4.34%	-1.57%

Volatility

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) is 4.08%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that SSLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSLCX	QISCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	5.08%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	16.83%	-6.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.28%	21.02%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	23.24%	-5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	24.17%	-3.12%

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QISCX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSLCX vs. QISCX - Dividend Comparison

SSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QISCX's 6.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QISCX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund	6.92%	7.97%	0.35%	0.31%	3.77%	15.41%	0.44%	0.36%	3.81%	4.49%	0.85%	12.05%
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund	1.07%	1.21%	1.52%	0.68%	1.07%	1.67%	0.35%	0.16%	5.99%	5.78%	0.60%	8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSLCX and QISCX in my portfolio?

SSLCX and QISCX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSLCX or QISCX?

QISCX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SSLCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSLCX dropped -63.14% vs QISCX's -68.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.