SSLCX vs. FSCTX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX).
SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000. FSCTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 1998.
Performance
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
FSCTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M | 0.58% | 11.57% | -4.53% | 18.02% | -20.91% | 30.90% | 16.86% | 32.04% | -16.52% | 13.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLCX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FSCTX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLCX has outperformed FSCTX with an annualized return of 9.91%, while FSCTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return.
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
FSCTX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCTX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSLCX vs. FSCTX — Risk / Return Rank
SSLCX
FSCTX
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLCX | FSCTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.02 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.54 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 1.45 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 6.18 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLCX | FSCTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.02 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.12 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLCX and FSCTX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Dividend Comparison
SSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than FSCTX's 2.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
FSCTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M | 2.22% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 6.07% | 12.11% | 2.99% | 4.38% | 16.01% | 15.16% | 2.30% | 8.94% |
Drawdowns
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than FSCTX's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLCX and FSCTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLCX | FSCTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -50.42% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -13.76% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.57% | -36.64% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.07% | -40.49% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -12.19% | +6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -11.96% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.22% | -0.13% |
Volatility
SSLCX vs. FSCTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) is 4.67%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class M (FSCTX) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that SSLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLCX | FSCTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 6.42% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.61% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 21.89% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 22.25% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 22.00% | -0.94% |