PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLCX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLCX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLCX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


SSLCX

1D
1.08%
1M
1.97%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.70%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
10.93%

DFISX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
12.74%4.99%9.85%13.09%-13.53%41.16%14.65%21.72%-14.28%11.63%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.65%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLCX and DFISX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.60

The correlation between SSLCX and DFISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLCX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLCX
SSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSLCXDFISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.15

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

7.90

-1.22

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLCX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSLCXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.87

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.52

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Drawdowns

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLCX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, roughly equal to the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLCX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLCXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-60.66%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-11.96%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-13.68%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

-35.06%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.07%

-43.00%

-5.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-11.64%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.24%

-0.47%

Volatility

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 3.78%. This indicates that SSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLCXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.78%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

11.00%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

13.77%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

15.89%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

16.20%

+4.85%

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSLCX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

SSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than DFISX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
SSLCX
DWS Small Cap Core Fund
1.07%1.21%1.52%0.68%1.07%1.67%0.35%0.16%5.99%5.78%0.60%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSLCX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSLCX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to DFISX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSLCX dropped -63.14% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

DFISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLCX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer