SSIIX vs. RPIEX
SSIIX (Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund) and RPIEX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, SSIIX returned 2.37%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for RPIEX. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. SSIIX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for RPIEX.
Performance
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSIIX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than RPIEX's 3.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSIIX having a 2.37% annualized return and RPIEX not far behind at 2.32%.
SSIIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
RPIEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 6.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSIIX Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund | 0.74% | 3.20% | 3.84% | 3.68% | -5.29% | 0.18% | 4.78% | 7.77% | -1.38% | 5.43% |
RPIEX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund | 3.29% | 4.82% | 6.83% | -4.51% | 3.08% | 0.08% | 9.42% | -0.39% | 0.89% | -1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSIIX and RPIEX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | -0.22 |
The correlation between SSIIX and RPIEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (5 years) to -0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSIIX vs. RPIEX — Risk / Return Rank
SSIIX
RPIEX
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund (SSIIX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSIIX | RPIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.63 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 5.49 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSIIX drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, roughly equal to the maximum RPIEX drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSIIX and RPIEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSIIX | RPIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -9.59% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -3.64% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.90% | -3.64% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.34% | -9.59% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.34% | -9.59% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.13% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -2.46% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.08% | -0.17% |
Volatility
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Volatility Comparison
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund (SSIIX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) at 1.03%. This indicates that SSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSIIX | RPIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.03% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 3.88% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83% | 4.40% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.06% | 4.91% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 4.19% | -1.59% |
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSIIX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIEX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSIIX vs. RPIEX - Dividend Comparison
SSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than RPIEX's 7.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIEX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund | 7.51% | 7.69% | 6.32% | 4.68% | 15.28% | 3.76% | 1.93% | 2.51% | 4.36% | 0.61% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
SSIIX Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund | 4.05% | 4.31% | 4.29% | 3.75% | 1.39% | 2.51% | 2.34% | 2.76% | 2.61% | 3.11% | 2.64% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSIIX and RPIEX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSIIX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to RPIEX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSIIX dropped -9.34% vs RPIEX's -9.59%.
SSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSIIX and RPIEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer