PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSHY.L vs. STYC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSHY.L is traded in GBP, while STYC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STYC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSHY.L achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than STYC.L's 1.82% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: SSHY.L at 6.28% and STYC.L at 6.28%.


SSHY.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.49%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
6.28%

STYC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.34%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.28%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
6.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.51%1.40%10.17%5.51%6.56%5.70%0.33%6.66%5.07%-3.96%
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
1.82%1.35%9.97%6.08%6.48%5.36%0.79%5.84%5.28%-3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SSHY.L and STYC.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2015

0.81

The correlation between SSHY.L and STYC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

STYC.L
STYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
STYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
STYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
STYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
STYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSHY.LSTYC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.06

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

6.39

+0.51

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the STYC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSHY.L and STYC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSHY.LSTYC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.76

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.65

-0.04

Drawdowns

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSHY.L drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, roughly equal to the maximum STYC.L drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHY.L and STYC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSHY.LSTYC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-15.73%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

-3.99%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.91%

-9.53%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

-11.00%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.94%

-15.73%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.86%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-4.03%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.29%

-0.11%

Volatility

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) is 1.59%, while PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that SSHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STYC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSHY.LSTYC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.13%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

5.12%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.67%

6.55%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

8.33%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

9.86%

-0.70%

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSHY.L and STYC.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

SSHY.L vs. STYC.L - Dividend Comparison

SSHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, while STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
7.07%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSHY.L and STYC.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSHY.L and STYC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSHY.L and STYC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer