SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L
SSHY.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) and JHYU.L (JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc)) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SSHY.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while JHYU.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSHY.L returned 5.91%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for JHYU.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSHY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JHYU.L.
Performance
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSHY.L is traded in GBP, while JHYU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JHYU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSHY.L achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than JHYU.L's 2.64% return.
SSHY.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 8.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.28%
JHYU.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 9.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 1.51% | 1.40% | 10.17% | 5.51% | 2.29% |
JHYU.L JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) | 2.64% | 1.61% | 9.83% | 5.20% | 2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSHY.L and JHYU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SSHY.L and JHYU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSHY.L
JHYU.L
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSHY.L | JHYU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.62 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 8.72 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSHY.L | JHYU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSHY.L drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than JHYU.L's maximum drawdown of -10.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHY.L and JHYU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSHY.L | JHYU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -10.49% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -3.69% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.91% | -9.27% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -3.51% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 1.11% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSHY.L | JHYU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 1.63% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 5.06% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 6.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 8.20% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.16% | 8.20% | +0.96% |
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSHY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JHYU.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSHY.L vs. JHYU.L - Dividend Comparison
SSHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, while JHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHYU.L JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 7.07% | 7.33% | 7.48% | 6.52% | 4.86% | 4.47% | 5.24% | 5.27% | 5.10% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSHY.L and JHYU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHYU.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHYU.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SSHY.L.
SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while JHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SSHY.L and 0.35% for JHYU.L.
Find the right allocation for SSHY.L and JHYU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer