PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSHY.L achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly higher than GHYG.L's 1.63% return.


SSHY.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.01%
YTD
3.24%
6M
3.79%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.60%

GHYG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.85%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
3.24%1.40%10.17%5.50%6.56%5.71%0.33%0.81%
GHYG.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.63%7.85%7.10%10.89%-9.48%3.58%2.27%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SSHY.L and GHYG.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2019

0.09

The correlation between SSHY.L and GHYG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYG.L
GHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSHY.LGHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.28

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

9.58

-1.41

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the GHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSHY.L and GHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSHY.L drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, which is greater than GHYG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHY.L and GHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSHY.LGHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.26%

-23.08%

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-2.56%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.91%

-4.51%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.25%

-14.41%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.29%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-2.97%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

0.61%

+0.57%

Volatility

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L) at 1.00%. This indicates that SSHY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSHY.LGHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.00%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

3.31%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

3.98%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

6.03%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

7.97%

+0.85%

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSHY.L and GHYG.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

SSHY.L vs. GHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

SSHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, which matches GHYG.L's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYG.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.86%5.34%5.26%4.70%4.14%3.73%4.55%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
6.89%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSHY.L and GHYG.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSHY.L and GHYG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GHYG.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSHY.L and GHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer