SSHVX vs. FSWCX
SSHVX (Sound Shore Fund Institutional Class) and FSWCX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SSHVX returned 10.60%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for FSWCX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSHVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FSWCX.
Performance
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSHVX achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSWCX's 16.21% return.
SSHVX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
FSWCX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 7.42%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 18.61%
- 1Y
- 38.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSHVX Sound Shore Fund Institutional Class | 5.41% | 18.37% | 22.67% | 17.67% | -10.47% | 23.99% | 7.92% | 23.49% | -12.44% | 0.08% |
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund | 16.21% | 22.50% | 19.90% | 12.64% | -3.50% | 30.43% | -4.44% | 29.09% | -11.54% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSHVX and FSWCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SSHVX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSHVX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank
SSHVX
FSWCX
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Shore Fund Institutional Class (SSHVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSHVX | FSWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.67 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 7.06 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 24.81 | -13.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSHVX | FSWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 3.64 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.86 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSHVX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FSWCX drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHVX and FSWCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSHVX | FSWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -41.41% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -5.77% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.69% | -16.13% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | -19.62% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | 0.00% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -5.57% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.63% | +1.01% |
Volatility
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison
Sound Shore Fund Institutional Class (SSHVX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) at 2.77%. This indicates that SSHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSHVX | FSWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 2.77% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 7.64% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 11.19% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 16.70% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 20.78% | -1.78% |
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSHVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSHVX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison
SSHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than FSWCX's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund | 6.37% | 7.40% | 8.86% | 9.68% | 12.90% | 5.71% | 2.55% | 2.37% | 3.84% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSHVX Sound Shore Fund Institutional Class | 12.72% | 13.41% | 25.54% | 4.54% | 4.81% | 27.05% | 7.90% | 7.66% | 8.43% | 11.89% | 7.21% | 12.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSHVX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSHVX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to FSWCX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSHVX dropped -39.90% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.
FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSHVX and FSWCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer