SSHIX vs. FUMBX
SSHIX (Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund) and FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, SSHIX returned 2.42%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for FUMBX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSHIX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUMBX.
Performance
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSHIX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's -0.11% return.
SSHIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
FUMBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSHIX Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund | 0.61% | 5.59% | 5.41% | 6.19% | -4.87% | 0.16% | 6.02% | 4.80% | 1.41% | -0.04% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.11% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSHIX and FUMBX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SSHIX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSHIX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
SSHIX
FUMBX
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSHIX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.28 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.89 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 5.55 | +5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSHIX drawdown since its inception was -7.13%, smaller than the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHIX and FUMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSHIX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -8.83% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.39% | -1.54% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.39% | -1.57% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.13% | -8.60% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.06% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -1.85% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 0.52% | -0.19% |
Volatility
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX) is 0.45%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that SSHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSHIX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 0.70% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 1.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 2.08% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.08% | 2.93% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.86% | 2.49% | -0.63% |
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSHIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSHIX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
SSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.77% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSHIX Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund | 4.20% | 4.27% | 4.43% | 3.92% | 1.92% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSHIX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUMBX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to SSHIX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSHIX dropped -7.13% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.
SSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSHIX and FUMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer