PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSEYX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSEYX achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 14.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SSEYX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 15.49%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


SSEYX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.51%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%

RCKSX

1D
0.43%
1M
1.47%
YTD
14.59%
6M
14.70%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
10.88%17.52%25.01%26.29%-18.18%28.58%18.28%31.42%-4.54%21.72%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.59%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SSEYX and RCKSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between SSEYX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSEYX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSEYX
SSEYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SSEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSEYXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

5.02

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

13.94

+0.69

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSEYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSEYX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSEYXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.80

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.47

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.62

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.38

+0.41

Drawdowns

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSEYX drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSEYX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSEYXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-57.88%

+24.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-4.14%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-18.22%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-22.54%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

-33.10%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.17%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-9.50%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.49%

+0.41%

Volatility

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSEYXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.96%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

7.99%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

11.56%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

15.66%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

17.54%

+0.52%

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSEYX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSEYX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

SSEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than RCKSX's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.46%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
1.25%1.38%1.93%1.46%1.57%2.48%3.63%2.36%5.91%5.37%2.29%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSEYX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCKSX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SSEYX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSEYX dropped -33.75% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

SSEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSEYX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer