PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSDDX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2045 Fund (SSDDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSDDX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than SSBWX's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SSDDX has outperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.01% annualized return.


SSDDX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.60%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.59%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.81%

SSBWX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.08%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.30%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSDDX
State Street Target Retirement 2045 Fund
10.91%19.92%11.80%18.48%-18.97%13.08%19.28%25.41%-7.95%19.14%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.96%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SSDDX and SSBWX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between SSDDX and SSBWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSDDX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSDDX
SSDDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SSDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SSDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2045 Fund (SSDDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSDDXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.61

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

3.74

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.52

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.13

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.30

13.90

-0.59

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSDDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSDDX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSDDXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.62

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.80

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.73

-0.04

Drawdowns

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSDDX drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than SSBWX's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSDDX and SSBWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSDDXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-23.73%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-6.20%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-9.73%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.80%

-23.73%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.22%

-23.73%

-5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.17%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.39%

+0.56%

Volatility

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2045 Fund (SSDDX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) at 2.33%. This indicates that SSDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSDDXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

2.33%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

5.97%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

7.42%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

10.65%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

11.33%

+2.93%

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSDDX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSDDX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

SSDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than SSBWX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.40%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%
SSDDX
State Street Target Retirement 2045 Fund
6.01%6.67%4.90%3.56%5.36%4.88%4.04%6.21%5.00%0.43%1.72%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SSDDX and SSBWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSDDX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to SSBWX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSDDX dropped -29.22% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSDDX and SSBWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer