PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSBRX vs. STLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSBRX achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than STLFX's 11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SSBRX has underperformed STLFX with an annualized return of 7.55%, while STLFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.


SSBRX

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.07%
6M
4.04%
YTD
6.02%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
7.55%
ALL TIME*
7.05%

STLFX

1D
2.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
7.93%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
8.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.02%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%
STLFX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund
11.50%20.03%5.73%22.31%-18.73%18.12%14.82%26.48%-8.22%21.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SSBRX and STLFX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.91

The correlation between SSBRX and STLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSBRX vs. STLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

STLFX
STLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
STLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
STLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSBRXSTLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.26

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

9.32

+2.09

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the STLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSBRX and STLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSBRX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum STLFX drawdown of -50.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSBRX and STLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSBRXSTLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-50.35%

+28.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-9.45%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.36%

-23.35%

+15.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-27.07%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

-34.48%

+12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.45%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-6.73%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.29%

-1.27%

Volatility

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) is 1.49%, while BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that SSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSBRXSTLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

4.27%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.88%

12.25%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.94%

14.68%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

17.04%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.75%

16.41%

-6.66%

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSBRX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than STLFX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSBRX vs. STLFX - Dividend Comparison

SSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than STLFX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.72%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%
STLFX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund
5.64%6.20%1.86%2.91%2.51%16.88%2.27%6.09%15.73%5.87%2.00%9.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SSBRX and STLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STLFX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to SSBRX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSBRX dropped -21.96% vs STLFX's -50.35%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSBRX and STLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer