PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSBRX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSBRX achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than SSBWX's 7.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SSBRX has underperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 7.93%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.


SSBRX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.66%
YTD
6.58%
6M
7.07%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
7.93%

SSBWX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.53%
YTD
7.67%
6M
8.31%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.58%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.67%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SSBRX and SSBWX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between SSBRX and SSBWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSBRX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSBRXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.62

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.24

3.75

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.52

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.13

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.50

13.95

+2.55

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSBRX and SSBWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSBRXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.62

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.60

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.80

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.72

+0.01

Drawdowns

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSBRX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum SSBWX drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSBRX and SSBWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSBRXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-23.73%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-6.20%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-9.73%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-23.73%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

-23.73%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-4.17%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.39%

-0.42%

Volatility

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) is 1.74%, while State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that SSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSBRXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

2.33%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

5.97%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

7.44%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

10.65%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

11.33%

-1.51%

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSBRX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSBRX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

SSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than SSBWX's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.69%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.42%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SSBRX and SSBWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSBWX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSBRX dropped -21.96% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSBRX and SSBWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer