PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSBRX vs. ARFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSBRX achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than ARFVX's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SSBRX has underperformed ARFVX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while ARFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.


SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%

ARFVX

1D
0.19%
1M
3.40%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.02%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
7.56%14.75%11.30%15.16%-17.44%13.36%17.43%24.02%-5.24%16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SSBRX and ARFVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.96

The correlation between SSBRX and ARFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSBRX vs. ARFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ARFVX
ARFVX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) and American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSBRXARFVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

2.07

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.22

2.93

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.38

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.45

+1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.33

10.56

+5.76

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the ARFVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSBRX and ARFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSBRXARFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.07

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.70

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.47

+0.27

Drawdowns

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSBRX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum ARFVX drawdown of -47.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSBRX and ARFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSBRXARFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-47.41%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-7.82%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-12.64%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-25.12%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

-29.55%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-6.54%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.81%

-0.84%

Volatility

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) is 1.74%, while American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that SSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSBRXARFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

2.73%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

7.38%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

9.26%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

12.49%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

13.60%

-3.78%

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSBRX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ARFVX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSBRX vs. ARFVX - Dividend Comparison

SSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than ARFVX's 13.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFVX
American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio
13.40%14.41%4.91%1.96%6.71%7.57%6.52%8.66%10.95%1.22%3.88%6.89%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SSBRX and ARFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARFVX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSBRX dropped -21.96% vs ARFVX's -47.41%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSBRX and ARFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer