SSASX vs. SSBWX
SSASX (State Street Income Fund) and SSBWX (State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both mutual funds - SSASX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by State Street, while SSBWX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by State Street. Over the past 5 years, SSASX returned -0.64%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for SSBWX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSASX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SSBWX.
Performance
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSASX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SSBWX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSASX State Street Income Fund | -0.00% | 7.49% | -0.95% | 4.83% | -13.74% | 0.59% |
SSBWX State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 7.96% | 15.92% | 9.76% | 15.66% | -17.17% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSASX and SSBWX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSASX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank
SSASX
SSBWX
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Income Fund (SSASX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSASX | SSBWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.52 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 3.13 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 13.90 | -9.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSASX | SSBWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.61 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.62 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.73 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSASX drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum SSBWX drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSASX and SSBWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSASX | SSBWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -23.73% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -6.20% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.97% | -9.73% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -23.73% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | 0.00% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -4.17% | -5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.39% | -0.25% |
Volatility
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Income Fund (SSASX) is 1.46%, while State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that SSASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSASX | SSBWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 2.33% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 5.97% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 7.42% | -3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 10.65% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 11.33% | -4.84% |
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSASX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSASX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison
SSASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than SSBWX's 6.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSASX State Street Income Fund | 4.00% | 4.01% | 2.76% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSBWX State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 6.40% | 6.91% | 6.16% | 4.11% | 5.78% | 6.18% | 4.92% | 6.65% | 5.24% | 0.46% | 1.75% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSASX and SSBWX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSBWX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to SSASX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSASX dropped -19.65% vs SSBWX's -23.73%.
SSBWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSASX and SSBWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer