SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
SSAC.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both SSAC.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSAC.L or CSPX.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 11.34%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.
SSAC.L
18.19%
1.91%
7.34%
23.43%
11.37%
11.34%
CSPX.L
24.07%
0.44%
11.62%
32.01%
15.02%
12.76%
Key characteristics
| SSAC.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.31 | 2.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.22 | 3.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.58 | 4.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.87 | 17.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.43% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.86% | 11.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.43% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.83% | -2.13% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and CSPX.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 3.10%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.