PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SRSA.L vs. QUID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

SRSA.L (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QUID.L (PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SRSA.L tracks the iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while QUID.L tracks the PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRSA.L returned 6.41%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for QUID.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SRSA.L is traded in GBp, while QUID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QUID.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRSA.L achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than QUID.L's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SRSA.L has outperformed QUID.L with an annualized return of 6.41%, while QUID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.

SRSA.L

1D
1.37%
1M
-5.51%
6M
-10.99%
YTD
-4.79%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
6.41%

QUID.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.97%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRSA.L
iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		-4.79%65.31%9.25%-5.19%7.61%5.31%-5.99%5.20%-21.09%24.74%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.18%4.89%5.67%4.95%-0.96%-0.07%0.71%1.57%0.26%0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SRSA.L and QUID.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SRSA.L
SRSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SRSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SRSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
QUID.L
QUID.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QUID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QUID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SRSA.LQUID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.02
6.00

-4.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.48
10.83

-9.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

2.80

-1.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

9.83

-8.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

78.74

-75.82

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the QUID.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRSA.L and QUID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRSA.L drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than QUID.L's maximum drawdown of -2.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRSA.L and QUID.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SRSA.LQUID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-2.47%

-50.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.06%

-0.45%

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-0.45%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-2.47%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.58%

-2.47%

-50.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.04%

0.00%

-20.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-0.21%

-16.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.60%

0.06%

+10.54%

Volatility

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L) at 0.19%. This indicates that SRSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SRSA.LQUID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

0.19%

+6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.83%

0.64%

+25.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.27%

0.74%

+29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.66%

0.74%

+27.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.97%

0.62%

+31.35%

Dividends

SRSA.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison

SRSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.17%4.19%4.67%3.69%0.66%0.08%0.31%0.73%0.52%0.33%0.59%0.55%
SRSA.L
iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SRSA.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRSA.L tracks iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while QUID.L tracks PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRSA.L and QUID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer