SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L
SRSA.L (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - SRSA.L tracks the iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SRSA.L returned 31.31% vs 22.33% for MWOZ.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRSA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MWOZ.L.
Performance
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SRSA.L is traded in GBp, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRSA.L achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.79% return.
SRSA.L
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.79% | 53.32% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 10.79% | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRSA.L and MWOZ.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRSA.L
MWOZ.L
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRSA.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.38 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 13.30 | -10.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRSA.L drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRSA.L and MWOZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRSA.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -18.50% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.06% | -6.63% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -0.44% | -19.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -2.99% | -13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 1.68% | +8.92% |
Volatility
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that SRSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRSA.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 2.77% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.83% | 8.05% | +17.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.27% | 10.88% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 13.82% | +14.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 13.82% | +18.15% |
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRSA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRSA.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison
SRSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 1.19% | 1.60% |
SRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRSA.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SRSA.L.
SRSA.L tracks iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SRSA.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.
Find the right allocation for SRSA.L and MWOZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer