PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRP.L vs. QQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Serco Group (SRP.L) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRP.L achieves a -7.80% return, which is significantly lower than QQ.L's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SRP.L has outperformed QQ.L with an annualized return of 9.83%, while QQ.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.16% annualized return.


SRP.L

1D
1.11%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-7.80%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
23.35%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
9.83%

QQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.33%
YTD
7.09%
6M
13.19%
1Y
-13.14%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRP.L
Serco Group
-7.80%89.19%-4.75%6.45%17.32%14.45%-25.62%69.35%-3.34%-30.98%
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
7.09%8.34%37.22%-11.50%37.15%-15.08%-8.68%27.80%27.13%-9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SRP.L and QQ.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2006

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SRP.L:

£2.66B

QQ.L:

£2.45B

EPS

SRP.L:

£0.18

QQ.L:

-£0.14

PS Ratio

SRP.L:

0.27

QQ.L:

0.66

PB Ratio

SRP.L:

3.04

QQ.L:

4.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRP.L:

£9.73B

QQ.L:

£3.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRP.L:

£1.06B

QQ.L:

£372.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

SRP.L:

£513.60M

QQ.L:

£533.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRP.L vs. QQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRP.L
SRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Serco Group (SRP.L) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRP.LQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.95

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

-0.47

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

-0.83

+6.72

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the QQ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRP.L and QQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRP.LQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

-0.41

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.26

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.22

+0.09

Drawdowns

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRP.L drawdown since its inception was -88.47%, which is greater than QQ.L's maximum drawdown of -55.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRP.L and QQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRP.LQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.47%

-55.68%

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.61%

-27.95%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.63%

-31.77%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.63%

-31.77%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

-38.09%

-6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.07%

-16.33%

-40.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.30%

-17.16%

-24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

13.52%

-7.38%

Volatility

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Serco Group (SRP.L) is 6.16%, while QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a volatility of 12.37%. This indicates that SRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRP.LQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

12.37%

-6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

22.28%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

32.03%

-11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

31.20%

-8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.40%

28.88%

+0.52%

Dividends

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Dividend Comparison

SRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than QQ.L's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.93%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%
SRP.L
Serco Group
1.77%1.53%2.39%1.89%1.64%1.63%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Serco Group and QinetiQ Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B202120222023202420252026
2.49B
1.02B
(SRP.L) Total Revenue
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

SRP.L vs. QQ.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Serco Group and QinetiQ Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%202120222023202420252026
10.6%
10.8%
Portfolio components
SRP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a gross profit of 262.80M and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SRP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported an operating income of 125.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

SRP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SRP.L and QQ.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRP.L and QQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer