SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L
SRIW.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - SRIW.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while XDEV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIW.L returned 11.01%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for XDEV.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRIW.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.
Performance
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 34.49% return.
SRIW.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- 67.77%
- 3Y*
- 26.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.21% | 6.01% | 19.08% | 21.28% | -15.04% | 26.40% | 12.45% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 34.49% | 30.51% | 6.79% | 13.25% | 1.01% | 21.67% | 11.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIW.L and XDEV.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SRIW.L and XDEV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Financial Services
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Industrials
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Consumer Cyclical
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Healthcare
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Consumer Defensive
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Communication Services
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Basic Materials
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Real Estate
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Utilities
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Energy
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRIW.L
XDEV.L
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIW.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.97 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 9.75 | -7.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 37.53 | -29.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIW.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 5.07 | -3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.33 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.86 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and XDEV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIW.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -28.20% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -6.92% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -14.00% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -14.00% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.91% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.35% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 1.80% | +0.91% |
Volatility
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) is 3.27%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that SRIW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIW.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 5.42% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 10.84% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 13.30% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 13.14% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 15.04% | +1.27% |
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SRIW.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while XDEV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.10% | 0.22% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIW.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRIW.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRIW.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.L.
SRIW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.
Find the right allocation for SRIW.L and XDEV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer