SRIW.L vs. UC04.L
SRIW.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - SRIW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIW.L returned 11.01%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for UC04.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRIW.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC04.L.
Performance
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than UC04.L's 10.50% return.
SRIW.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
UC04.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.21% | 6.01% | 19.08% | 21.28% | -15.04% | 26.40% | 12.45% |
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.50% | 9.28% | 27.38% | 20.52% | -10.51% | 28.96% | 12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIW.L and UC04.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SRIW.L and UC04.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Financial Services
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Industrials
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Consumer Cyclical
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Healthcare
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Consumer Defensive
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Communication Services
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Basic Materials
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Real Estate
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Utilities
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Energy
SRIW.L
UC04.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRIW.L
UC04.L
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIW.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.74 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 13.07 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIW.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.70 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum UC04.L drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and UC04.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIW.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -25.93% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -7.67% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -21.14% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -21.14% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -3.46% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.20% | +0.51% |
Volatility
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that SRIW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIW.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.72% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 7.24% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 10.63% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 14.66% | +1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 15.86% | +0.45% |
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SRIW.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison
SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than UC04.L's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIW.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.10% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.95% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.89% | 1.28% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIW.L and UC04.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIW.L.
SRIW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UC04.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. SRIW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.
Find the right allocation for SRIW.L and UC04.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer