PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 6.48% return.


SRIW.L

1D
0.25%
1M
6.85%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.45%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*

SBUY.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.68%
YTD
6.48%
6M
8.35%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SRIW.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.21%6.01%19.08%21.28%-15.04%26.40%12.45%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.48%21.60%14.64%9.46%-0.90%21.36%19.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIW.L and SBUY.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.63

The correlation between SRIW.L and SBUY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRIW.L
SBUY.L

Technology

35.9%
7.6%

Financial Services

16.4%
32.9%

Industrials

11.8%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
15.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.2%

Energy

0.0%
17.1%

Technology

SRIW.L
35.9%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Financial Services

SRIW.L
16.4%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Industrials

SRIW.L
11.8%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SRIW.L
10.9%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Healthcare

SRIW.L
9.0%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

SRIW.L
5.7%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Communication Services

SRIW.L
4.0%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

SRIW.L
3.0%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Real Estate

SRIW.L
2.5%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Utilities

SRIW.L
0.9%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Energy

SRIW.L
0.0%
SBUY.L
17.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIW.L
SRIW.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRIW.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

5.25

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

16.93

-8.63

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIW.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRIW.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.57

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.80

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.84

+0.17

Drawdowns

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRIW.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-30.91%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-4.79%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-17.76%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-17.76%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-3.99%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.49%

+1.22%

Volatility

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that SRIW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRIW.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.32%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

7.04%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

9.81%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

13.73%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.51%

+0.80%

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRIW.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SBUY.L's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%
SRIW.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%1.28%1.25%1.26%1.47%1.10%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRIW.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SRIW.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SRIW.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRIW.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer