PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SRIW.L is traded in GBp, while MVEW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRIW.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.


SRIW.L

1D
0.25%
1M
6.85%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.45%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*

MVEW.L

1D
0.20%
1M
1.97%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.14%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SRIW.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.21%6.01%19.08%21.28%-15.04%26.40%8.29%
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.37%3.73%12.44%4.00%-0.60%18.17%-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SRIW.L and MVEW.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.53

The correlation between SRIW.L and MVEW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRIW.L
MVEW.L

Technology

35.9%
22.6%

Financial Services

16.4%
15.2%

Industrials

11.8%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
5.4%

Healthcare

9.0%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
10.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
10.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.4%

Utilities

0.9%
6.7%

Energy

0.0%
3.3%

Technology

SRIW.L
35.9%
MVEW.L
22.6%

Financial Services

SRIW.L
16.4%
MVEW.L
15.2%

Industrials

SRIW.L
11.8%
MVEW.L
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SRIW.L
10.9%
MVEW.L
5.4%

Healthcare

SRIW.L
9.0%
MVEW.L
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

SRIW.L
5.7%
MVEW.L
10.2%

Communication Services

SRIW.L
4.0%
MVEW.L
10.5%

Basic Materials

SRIW.L
3.0%
MVEW.L
1.5%

Real Estate

SRIW.L
2.5%
MVEW.L
1.4%

Utilities

SRIW.L
0.9%
MVEW.L
6.7%

Energy

SRIW.L
0.0%
MVEW.L
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRIW.L
SRIW.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRIW.LMVEW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.07

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.56

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

1.47

+6.83

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRIW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRIW.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRIW.LMVEW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

0.41

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.68

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.60

+0.41

Drawdowns

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIW.L and MVEW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRIW.LMVEW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-10.07%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-5.85%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-9.04%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-10.07%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.02%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-2.57%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.22%

+0.49%

Volatility

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that SRIW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRIW.LMVEW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.63%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

5.97%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

8.00%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

9.78%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

10.08%

+6.23%

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRIW.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRIW.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

SRIW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRIW.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%1.28%1.25%1.26%1.47%1.10%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRIW.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SRIW.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SRIW.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIW.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRIW.L and MVEW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer