SRHR vs. CRED
SRHR (SRH REIT Covered Call ETF) and CRED (Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. SRHR is actively managed, while CRED is passively managed. Over the past year, SRHR returned 12.18% vs 9.04% for CRED. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SRHR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CRED.
Performance
SRHR vs. CRED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRHR achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than CRED's 12.55% return.
SRHR
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 12.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRED
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRHR vs. CRED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SRHR SRH REIT Covered Call ETF | 10.80% | -0.91% | 3.94% | 15.82% |
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 12.55% | -2.30% | 5.21% | 17.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRHR and CRED is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SRHR and CRED has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SRHR vs. CRED - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRHR
CRED
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
SRHR
CRED
Basic Materials
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Communication Services
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Consumer Defensive
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Energy
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Financial Services
SRHR
-
CRED
Healthcare
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Industrials
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Technology
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Utilities
SRHR
-
CRED
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRHR vs. CRED — Risk / Return Rank
SRHR
CRED
SRHR vs. CRED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SRH REIT Covered Call ETF (SRHR) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRHR | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.71 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.03 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.08 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 2.45 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRHR | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.71 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.56 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SRHR vs. CRED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRHR drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, which is greater than CRED's maximum drawdown of -17.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHR and CRED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRHR | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.68% | -17.59% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.32% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.19% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -5.65% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.67% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SRHR vs. CRED - Volatility Comparison
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF (SRHR) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) at 3.85%. This indicates that SRHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRHR | CRED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 3.85% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 9.43% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 12.73% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.25% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.25% | -0.41% |
SRHR vs. CRED - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRHR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRED's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRHR vs. CRED - Dividend Comparison
SRHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than CRED's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRED Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF | 4.52% | 5.50% | 4.82% | 2.72% |
SRHR SRH REIT Covered Call ETF | 6.40% | 7.07% | 6.90% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRHR and CRED have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRHR has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to CRED (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRHR dropped -18.68% vs CRED's -17.59%.
On 1-year performance, SRHR leads with 12.18% vs 9.04% for CRED. On fees, CRED is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CRED has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SRHR has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRED is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SRHR.
SRHR has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 4.52% for CRED.
They also come from different issuers: SRH and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SRHR and 0.33% for CRED.
SRHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRHR and CRED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer