SRFM vs. SNOW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SRFM (Surf Air Mobility Inc.) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. SRFM operates in Airlines (Industrials), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, SRFM returned -47.69% vs 24.25% for SNOW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SRFM vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRFM achieves a -41.75% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 19.05% return.

SRFM

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: -41.75%
• 6M: -45.67%
• 1Y: -47.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNOW

• 1D: -6.79%
• 1M: 85.21%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 24.25%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 1.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRFM vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SRFM Surf Air Mobility Inc.	-41.75%	-64.01%	-50.32%	-50.79%
SNOW Snowflake Inc.	19.05%	42.06%	-22.41%	18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SRFM and SNOW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023	0.20

Fundamentals

EPS SRFM : -$7.17 SNOW : -$3.53
PS Ratio SRFM : 0.16 SNOW : 17.61
Total Revenue (TTM) SRFM : $108.66M SNOW : $5.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) SRFM : $5.05M SNOW : $3.38B
EBITDA (TTM) SRFM : -$74.08M SNOW : -$1.21B

Return for Risk

SRFM vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRFM

SRFM Risk / Return Rank: 29
SRFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SRFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SRFM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SRFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
SRFM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SNOW

SNOW Risk / Return Rank: 54
SNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRFM vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRFM	SNOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	0.38	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	1.12	-0.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.15	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	0.48	-1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	1.05	-1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRFM vs. SNOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SNOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRFM and SNOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRFM	SNOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	0.38	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	0.01	-0.44

Drawdowns

SRFM vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRFM drawdown since its inception was -95.69%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRFM and SNOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRFM	SNOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.69%	-72.99%	-22.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.30%	-56.30%	-32.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.88%	-35.02%	-59.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.40%	-49.10%	-31.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.81%	25.80%	+40.01%

Volatility

SRFM vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) is 28.14%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 34.66%. This indicates that SRFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRFM	SNOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.14%	34.66%	-6.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.31%	53.56%	+18.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	149.27%	64.78%	+84.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.30%	61.83%	+89.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.30%	62.75%	+88.55%

Dividends

SRFM vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SRFM nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SRFM vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Surf Air Mobility Inc. and Snowflake Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SRFM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Surf Air Mobility Inc. reported a gross profit of -333.00K and revenue of 25.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.3%.

SNOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

SRFM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Surf Air Mobility Inc. reported an operating income of -13.36M and revenue of 25.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -52.1%.

SNOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.

SRFM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Surf Air Mobility Inc. reported a net income of -20.26M and revenue of 25.61M, resulting in a net margin of -79.1%.

SNOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRFM and SNOW in my portfolio?

SRFM and SNOW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRFM or SNOW?

SNOW has higher volatility (34.66%) compared to SRFM (28.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRFM dropped -95.69% vs SNOW's -72.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.