SRCMX vs. APUSX
SRCMX (Principal California Municipal Fund) and APUSX (Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SRCMX returned 0.38%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for APUSX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRCMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for APUSX.
Performance
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRCMX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than APUSX's 0.81% return.
SRCMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
APUSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRCMX Principal California Municipal Fund | 1.34% | 4.39% | 2.66% | 5.03% | -11.08% | 1.91% | 4.75% |
APUSX Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund | 0.81% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.63% | -0.18% | -0.40% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRCMX and APUSX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.28 |
The correlation between SRCMX and APUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRCMX vs. APUSX — Risk / Return Rank
SRCMX
APUSX
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal California Municipal Fund (SRCMX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRCMX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 5.06 | -3.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 24.81 | -22.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 68.37 | -60.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRCMX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 3.20 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.68 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.45 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRCMX drawdown since its inception was -23.64%, which is greater than APUSX's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRCMX and APUSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRCMX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -1.64% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -0.10% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.75% | -1.00% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.07% | -1.35% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -0.29% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.04% | +0.75% |
Volatility
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Volatility Comparison
Principal California Municipal Fund (SRCMX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX) at 0.24%. This indicates that SRCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRCMX | APUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 0.24% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 0.54% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63% | 0.78% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 1.25% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 1.13% | +3.02% |
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than APUSX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRCMX vs. APUSX - Dividend Comparison
SRCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than APUSX's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APUSX Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund | 2.44% | 3.69% | 3.68% | 1.69% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRCMX Principal California Municipal Fund | 3.48% | 4.24% | 3.34% | 2.31% | 2.21% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 2.85% | 3.19% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 4.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRCMX and APUSX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRCMX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to APUSX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRCMX dropped -23.64% vs APUSX's -1.64%.
APUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRCMX and APUSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer