PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYY.L achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than 3TSM.L's 149.88% return.


SPYY.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.88%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
10.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3TSM.L

1D
3.09%
1M
41.02%
YTD
149.88%
6M
166.79%
1Y
543.00%
3Y*
150.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYY.L and 3TSM.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.51

The correlation between SPYY.L and 3TSM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYY.L
SPYY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

3TSM.L
3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYY.L3TSM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

11.56

-10.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

33.54

-31.31

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYY.L and 3TSM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYY.L3TSM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

5.12

-4.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Drawdowns

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYY.L drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum 3TSM.L drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYY.L and 3TSM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYY.L3TSM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-93.59%

+75.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-46.56%

+31.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

0.00%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-55.66%

+50.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

16.08%

-11.29%

Volatility

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L) is 2.78%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) has a volatility of 37.09%. This indicates that SPYY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3TSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYY.L3TSM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

37.09%

-34.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

77.74%

-68.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

105.51%

-92.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

114.35%

-99.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

114.35%

-99.88%

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than 3TSM.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYY.L vs. 3TSM.L - Dividend Comparison

SPYY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.35%, while 3TSM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPYY.L and 3TSM.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSM.L.

SPYY.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 3TSM.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPYY.L and 0.75% for 3TSM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYY.L and 3TSM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer