PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYX vs. XEN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYX is traded in USD, while XEN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XEN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than XEN.TO's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYX has outperformed XEN.TO with an annualized return of 15.50%, while XEN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.


SPYX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
8.26%
6M
8.62%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
15.50%

XEN.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
5.48%
6M
6.69%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
8.26%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF
5.48%40.59%7.78%14.91%-9.13%28.06%2.13%22.38%-15.07%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYX and XEN.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2015

0.51

The correlation between SPYX and XEN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYX
XEN.TO

Technology

39.7%
8.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
34.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
3.3%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

7.9%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.1%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
18.3%

Energy

1.1%
18.6%

Technology

SPYX
39.7%
XEN.TO
8.1%

Financial Services

SPYX
11.4%
XEN.TO
34.8%

Communication Services

SPYX
10.9%
XEN.TO
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYX
10.1%
XEN.TO
3.3%

Healthcare

SPYX
8.5%
XEN.TO

-

Industrials

SPYX
7.9%
XEN.TO
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPYX
4.6%
XEN.TO
3.1%

Utilities

SPYX
2.2%
XEN.TO
2.6%

Real Estate

SPYX
1.9%
XEN.TO
0.4%

Basic Materials

SPYX
1.7%
XEN.TO
18.3%

Energy

SPYX
1.1%
XEN.TO
18.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYX vs. XEN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XEN.TO
XEN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XEN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYXXEN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.09

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.78

12.79

-2.01

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the XEN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYX and XEN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum XEN.TO drawdown of -61.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and XEN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYXXEN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.84%

-61.87%

+29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-9.00%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-13.19%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-24.36%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.84%

-42.40%

+9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-3.11%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-11.97%

+7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.17%

+0.02%

Volatility

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) at 3.16%. This indicates that SPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYXXEN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.16%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

10.63%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

13.54%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

15.77%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

16.73%

+1.31%

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XEN.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYX vs. XEN.TO - Dividend Comparison

SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XEN.TO's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.86%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF
1.72%1.83%2.29%2.46%2.60%1.74%3.72%2.13%2.31%1.75%2.07%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYX and XEN.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XEN.TO.

SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while XEN.TO is Canada Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while XEN.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.55% for XEN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYX and XEN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer