PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than VSMVX's 20.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYX has outperformed VSMVX with an annualized return of 15.14%, while VSMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.18% annualized return.


SPYX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.41%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.58%

VSMVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
6M
12.92%
YTD
20.21%
1Y
39.48%
3Y*
12.36%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.18%
ALL TIME*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.48M$4.14M$6.01M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
9.59%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.21%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYX and VSMVX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2015

0.71

The correlation between SPYX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.84

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

13.25

-4.87

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum VSMVX drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.84%

-47.61%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-9.33%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-28.81%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-28.81%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.84%

-47.61%

+14.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.61%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-7.56%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.70%

-0.42%

Volatility

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

11.21%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

17.83%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

21.76%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

24.07%

-6.06%

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VSMVX's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.86%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.74%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYX and VSMVX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to VSMVX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VSMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer