SPYX vs. PBW
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while PBW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYX returned 15.14%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for PBW. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.
Performance
SPYX vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than PBW's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYX has outperformed PBW with an annualized return of 15.14%, while PBW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.
SPYX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.58%
PBW
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 46.40%
- 3Y*
- -7.64%
- 5Y*
- -15.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.14M | $32.16M | $36.05M | |
| $4.48M | $4.14M | $6.01M |
SPYX vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 9.59% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 23.25% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 5.86% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -29.86% | 204.82% | 62.58% | -14.11% | 39.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and PBW is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SPYX and PBW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYX vs. PBW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
PBW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
PBW
Financial Services
SPYX
PBW
Communication Services
SPYX
PBW
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
PBW
Healthcare
SPYX
PBW
-
Industrials
SPYX
PBW
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
PBW
Utilities
SPYX
PBW
Real Estate
SPYX
PBW
-
Basic Materials
SPYX
PBW
Energy
SPYX
PBW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
PBW
SPYX vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYX | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.20 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 3.64 | +4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and PBW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -89.02% | +56.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -36.09% | +26.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | -65.32% | +46.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -84.50% | +58.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | -89.02% | +56.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -73.32% | +72.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -62.94% | +58.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 11.82% | -9.54% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) is 3.52%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 14.90%. This indicates that SPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 14.90% | -11.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 33.63% | -23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 44.14% | -31.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 43.61% | -26.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 39.25% | -21.24% |
SPYX vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than PBW's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 1.47% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYX and PBW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBW has higher volatility (14.90%) compared to SPYX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs PBW's -89.02%.
On 10-year performance, SPYX leads with 15.14% vs 7.09% for PBW. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.
PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while PBW is Alternative Energy Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.61% for PBW.
SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and PBW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer