SPYX vs. ETHO
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYX returned 27.01% vs 34.51% for ETHO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ETHO.
Performance
SPYX vs. ETHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than ETHO's 17.28% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX vs. ETHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 10.04% | 17.87% | 20.94% |
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and ETHO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SPYX and ETHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYX vs. ETHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
ETHO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
ETHO
Financial Services
SPYX
ETHO
Communication Services
SPYX
ETHO
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
ETHO
Healthcare
SPYX
ETHO
Industrials
SPYX
ETHO
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
ETHO
Utilities
SPYX
ETHO
Real Estate
SPYX
ETHO
Basic Materials
SPYX
ETHO
Energy
SPYX
ETHO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. ETHO — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
ETHO
SPYX vs. ETHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYX | ETHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.75 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 14.52 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYX | ETHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.97 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. ETHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, which is greater than ETHO's maximum drawdown of -25.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and ETHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | ETHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -25.50% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -9.25% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.81% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -4.50% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.38% | -0.24% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. ETHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) is 3.00%, while Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that SPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | ETHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 4.11% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 12.77% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 17.64% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 19.40% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.40% | -1.39% |
SPYX vs. ETHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. ETHO - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than ETHO's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.84% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYX and ETHO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHO has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SPYX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs ETHO's -25.50%.
On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.51% vs 27.01% for SPYX. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.51% return vs 27.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.
SPYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.73% for ETHO.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while ETHO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.45% for ETHO.
SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and ETHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer