SPYX vs. EMXC
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYX returned 12.96%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
SPYX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
EMXC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 37.25%
- 6M
- 42.23%
- 1Y
- 67.80%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 8.26% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 8.72% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.25% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and EMXC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SPYX and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYX vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
EMXC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
EMXC
Financial Services
SPYX
EMXC
Communication Services
SPYX
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
EMXC
Healthcare
SPYX
EMXC
Industrials
SPYX
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
EMXC
Utilities
SPYX
EMXC
Real Estate
SPYX
EMXC
Basic Materials
SPYX
EMXC
Energy
SPYX
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
EMXC
SPYX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 4.55 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 17.51 | -6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -42.81% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -14.41% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | -19.12% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -28.91% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -4.12% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -10.17% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.74% | -1.55% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) is 4.52%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that SPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 12.83% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 21.90% | -11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 23.90% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 18.00% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 20.07% | -2.03% |
SPYX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYX and EMXC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to SPYX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 12.96% vs 12.14% for EMXC. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer