SPYX vs. EEMX
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while EEMX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYX returned 13.41%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for EEMX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EEMX.
Performance
SPYX vs. EEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than EEMX's 28.94% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
EEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 9.99%
- YTD
- 28.94%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 58.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX vs. EEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 10.04% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 23.25% |
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 28.94% | 35.23% | 7.22% | 9.80% | -19.75% | -3.57% | 19.55% | 18.56% | -16.76% | 38.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and EEMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SPYX and EEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYX vs. EEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
EEMX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
EEMX
Financial Services
SPYX
EEMX
Communication Services
SPYX
EEMX
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
EEMX
Healthcare
SPYX
EEMX
Industrials
SPYX
EEMX
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
EEMX
Utilities
SPYX
EEMX
Real Estate
SPYX
EEMX
Basic Materials
SPYX
EEMX
Energy
SPYX
EEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. EEMX — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
EEMX
SPYX vs. EEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYX | EEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.51 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.23 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 16.72 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYX | EEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.83 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.42 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.48 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. EEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum EEMX drawdown of -39.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and EEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | EEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -39.90% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -13.89% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | -17.64% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -37.08% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.31% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -14.74% | +10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 3.51% | -1.37% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. EEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) is 3.00%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that SPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | EEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 8.88% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 18.19% | -8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 20.74% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 19.15% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 20.22% | -2.21% |
SPYX vs. EEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. EEMX - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than EEMX's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 1.75% | 2.28% | 2.26% | 2.20% | 2.38% | 1.72% | 1.42% | 2.57% | 2.41% | 2.45% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.84% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYX and EEMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to SPYX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs EEMX's -39.90%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 13.41% vs 8.07% for EEMX. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 13.41% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.
EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.84% for SPYX.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while EEMX is Asia Pacific Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.30% for EEMX.
EEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and EEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer