PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.


SPYT

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and OMAH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.58

The correlation between SPYT and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYT vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
OMAH

Technology

36.2%
13.6%

Financial Services

11.9%
38.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.0%

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
16.2%

Energy

3.5%
10.5%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SPYT
36.2%
OMAH
13.6%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.9%
OMAH
38.9%

Communication Services

SPYT
10.9%
OMAH
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.1%
OMAH
4.1%

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
OMAH
7.0%

Industrials

SPYT
8.1%
OMAH

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.9%
OMAH
16.2%

Energy

SPYT
3.5%
OMAH
10.5%

Utilities

SPYT
2.3%
OMAH

-

Real Estate

SPYT
1.9%
OMAH

-

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.8%
OMAH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYTOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.82

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

9.48

+4.12

SPYT vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYT and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYTOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.43

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.70

+0.38

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-11.83%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-3.00%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-2.65%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-1.26%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.21%

+0.51%

Volatility

SPYT vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that SPYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

1.93%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

5.49%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

8.05%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

13.21%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

13.21%

+1.59%

SPYT vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
15.44%12.86%0.00%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
20.73%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and OMAH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYT has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYT dropped -18.25% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, SPYT leads with 23.29% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYT has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.95% for OMAH.

SPYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer