PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


SPYT

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
9.70%0.99%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
363.23%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and ARMW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.53

SPYT vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
ARMW

Technology

36.2%
36.0%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SPYT
36.2%
ARMW
36.0%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.9%
ARMW

-

Communication Services

SPYT
10.9%
ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.1%
ARMW

-

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
ARMW

-

Industrials

SPYT
8.1%
ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.9%
ARMW

-

Energy

SPYT
3.5%
ARMW

-

Utilities

SPYT
2.3%
ARMW

-

Real Estate

SPYT
1.9%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.8%
ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYTARMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

SPYT vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYTARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

4.96

-3.87

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-48.47%

+30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-26.55%

+24.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

Volatility

SPYT vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTARMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

88.46%

-77.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

88.46%

-73.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

88.46%

-73.66%

SPYT vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%0.00%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
20.73%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and ARMW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer