SPYQ vs. RINC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPYQ (Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF) and RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. SPYQ is actively managed, while RINC is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RINC.

Performance

SPYQ vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPYQ

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 51.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	18.82%	26.22%	4.76%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ and RINC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between SPYQ and RINC has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SPYQ vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ

SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYQ	RINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYQ	RINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYQ	RINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPYQ	RINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.73%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.64%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.64%	—	—

SPYQ vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYQ vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RINC's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	0.14%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYQ and RINC in my portfolio?

SPYQ and RINC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPYQ or RINC?

On fees, RINC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYQ or RINC?

RINC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYQ or RINC?

RINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.14% for SPYQ.

What is the main difference between SPYQ and RINC?

SPYQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RINC is REIT. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 0.89% for RINC.