PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (SPYQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYQ.DE having a 8.86% return and DXSL.DE slightly lower at 8.84%. Over the past 10 years, SPYQ.DE has outperformed DXSL.DE with an annualized return of 12.56%, while DXSL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.


SPYQ.DE

1D
0.62%
1M
0.55%
YTD
8.86%
6M
11.04%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
12.56%

DXSL.DE

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
8.84%
6M
10.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYQ.DE
SPDR MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
8.86%25.52%14.36%26.68%-16.54%28.05%4.02%37.55%-14.12%15.52%
DXSL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.84%15.36%9.82%24.09%-19.61%29.29%6.12%36.96%-13.91%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.98

The correlation between SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ.DE
SPYQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPYQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DXSL.DE
DXSL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (SPYQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYQ.DEDXSL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

3.89

+0.47

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYQ.DEDXSL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.47

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.56

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.38

+0.22

Drawdowns

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.44%, smaller than the maximum DXSL.DE drawdown of -58.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYQ.DEDXSL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.44%

-58.54%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-13.21%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-20.06%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

-31.06%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.44%

-41.92%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-3.07%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-10.00%

+3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.75%

-0.17%

Volatility

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (SPYQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYQ.DEDXSL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

6.00%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

15.78%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

19.33%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

19.22%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

19.64%

-0.04%

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DXSL.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYQ.DE vs. DXSL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYQ.DE nor DXSL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DXSL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYQ.DE.

SPYQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Industrials 20/35 Capped, while DXSL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened 20-35. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPYQ.DE and 0.17% for DXSL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYQ.DE and DXSL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer