PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM.DE achieves a 23.48% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDH.DE's 5.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYM.DE having a 8.80% annualized return and ZPDH.DE not far ahead at 9.06%.


SPYM.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-4.66%
6M
16.47%
YTD
23.48%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
8.80%

ZPDH.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
5.72%
6M
3.79%
YTD
5.62%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
23.48%19.06%14.05%6.05%-14.90%5.28%6.27%22.31%-11.26%19.74%
ZPDH.DE
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
5.62%1.74%8.46%-1.75%3.34%37.75%1.69%24.34%9.10%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.39

The correlation between SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM.DE
SPYM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDH.DE
ZPDH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYM.DEZPDH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.13

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

5.27

+6.21

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than ZPDH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYM.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-26.63%

-18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-10.79%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-22.66%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-22.66%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

-26.63%

-5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

-3.48%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-6.99%

-10.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.37%

-0.93%

Volatility

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that SPYM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPDH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYM.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

5.55%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

11.02%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

15.28%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

14.63%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

16.71%

+1.82%

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYM.DE nor ZPDH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

SPYM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZPDH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. SPYM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while ZPDH.DE tracks S&P Health Care Select Sector. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPYM.DE and 0.15% for ZPDH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM.DE and ZPDH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer