PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-6.38%17.39%25.33%14.46%
SWRD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
-4.94%21.09%19.26%15.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.L achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's -4.94% return.


SPYL.L

1D
0.48%
1M
-6.33%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-2.71%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SWRD.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
-4.94%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRD.L
SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYL.LSWRD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.73

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.51

+1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.12

7.22

+6.90

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.L and SWRD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYL.LSWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.71

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.L and SWRD.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.L and SWRD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYL.LSWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-34.10%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-11.47%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-7.72%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-5.11%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.40%

-0.60%

Volatility

SPYL.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) is 4.11%, while SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SPYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPYL.LSWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.72%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

8.44%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

15.29%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

15.43%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.96%

17.31%

-3.35%