PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.DE achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDH.DE's 5.62% return.


SPYL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.25%
6M
11.87%
YTD
12.88%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZPDH.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
5.72%
6M
3.79%
YTD
5.62%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
12.88%4.71%32.33%8.23%
ZPDH.DE
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
5.62%1.74%8.46%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.34

The correlation between SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDH.DE
ZPDH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYL.DEZPDH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.13

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

5.27

+6.24

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum ZPDH.DE drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYL.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-26.63%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-10.79%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-3.48%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-6.99%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

4.37%

-2.34%

Volatility

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) is 2.80%, while SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that SPYL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYL.DEZPDH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

5.55%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

11.02%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

15.28%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

14.63%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

16.71%

-1.78%

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPDH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYL.DE vs. ZPDH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.DE nor ZPDH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZPDH.DE.

SPYL.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while ZPDH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZPDH.DE tracks S&P Health Care Select Sector. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.15% for ZPDH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYL.DE and ZPDH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer