SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L
SPYL.DE (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYL.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYL.DE returned 26.53% vs 31.57% for VJPB.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYL.DE charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.
Performance
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPYL.DE is traded in EUR, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYL.DE achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than VJPB.L's 16.52% return.
SPYL.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VJPB.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYL.DE State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) | 11.37% | 4.71% | 32.33% | 9.54% |
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.52% | 11.83% | 13.74% | 5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYL.DE and VJPB.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPYL.DE
VJPB.L
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYL.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.10 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 10.24 | +2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -39.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and VJPB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYL.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.27% | -39.25% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -9.93% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.89% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -10.41% | +7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.02% | -1.01% |
Volatility
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) is 2.66%, while Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that SPYL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYL.DE | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 4.36% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 14.86% | -7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 18.33% | -6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 21.48% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 22.45% | -7.85% |
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYL.DE vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPYL.DE nor VJPB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYL.DE and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.
SPYL.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while VJPB.L is Japan Equities. SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.15% for VJPB.L.
Find the right allocation for SPYL.DE and VJPB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer