SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPYL.DE (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYL.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYL.DE returned 25.61% vs 43.90% for QDVF.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYL.DE charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.

Performance

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.DE achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.

SPYL.DE

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 25.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVF.DE

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 29.55%
• 1Y: 43.90%
• 3Y*: 13.74%
• 5Y*: 21.44%
• 10Y*: 8.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPYL.DE State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)	11.37%	4.71%	32.33%	9.54%
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)	32.71%	-2.67%	9.20%	-5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023	0.22

The correlation between SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.DE

SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QDVF.DE

QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYL.DE	QDVF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.82	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.29	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	2.54	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	7.98	+4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYL.DE	QDVF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	1.82	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.28	+1.25

Drawdowns

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYL.DE	QDVF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.27%	-65.81%	+42.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-17.23%	+10.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-8.92%	+8.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-17.41%	+14.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	5.49%	-3.48%

Volatility

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) is 2.66%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SPYL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYL.DE	QDVF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	7.70%	-5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.57%	20.43%	-12.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	24.05%	-12.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	26.95%	-12.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.61%	28.68%	-14.07%

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPYL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE in my portfolio?

SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPYL.DE or QDVF.DE?

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYL.DE or QDVF.DE?

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.

What is the main difference between SPYL.DE and QDVF.DE?

SPYL.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.