PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYL.DE having a 11.37% return and 4UBQ.DE slightly lower at 11.15%.


SPYL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.37%
6M
11.41%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

4UBQ.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
5.42%
YTD
11.15%
6M
11.64%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
11.37%4.71%32.33%9.54%
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.15%5.39%31.02%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.97

The correlation between SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBQ.DE
4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYL.DE4UBQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.10

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

15.73

-3.01

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYL.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.47

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.11

+0.43

Drawdowns

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, roughly equal to the maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYL.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-23.35%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-6.93%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-4.02%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.81%

+0.20%

Volatility

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) is 2.66%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that SPYL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYL.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.81%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

7.61%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

11.53%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.27%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.39%

-0.78%

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYL.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYL.DE and 4UBQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer